The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 514 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
You mentioned a couple of international examples that might be worth following. You talked about Nordic countries. Is Norway or another country doing all this better than us? I am aware that Nordic countries provide much better quality public services than we do. They pay higher taxes than we do, but, in return, they have a much higher basic standard of living. Are there any examples that we should look to follow, understanding that we might not have all the tools at our disposal?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
Wow. That is a bit of an eye opener.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
It would be useful to have it in writing, of course, but the bottom line is, is it working for the four-tier support system now?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
Will it work for a four-tier system?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
There are concerns about the proposals. I do not think that anyone is against what you are trying to achieve. However, if, for instance, a crofter gets a payment of £2,000 but pays out most of that on help and advice to meet the criteria, that will put them out of business. Can you guarantee that the costs will be met either through full cost recovery or through the RPID office completing forms for crofters, bearing in mind that many are in areas in which they cannot get online and they do not have broadband? It needs to be either done for them or paid for.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
The schemes are designed for people who get tens of thousands of pounds in support rather than those who get minimal support, and the support that the latter people get will be spent on trying to qualify for that support. It is just logical that they would stop.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
Can it not do that just now?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
I do not agree that that is the case—I feel that we do not have a handle on the Government’s vision and direction for agriculture. In a way, that is what the plan was supposed to set out. It just seems that we have a piecemeal approach, and I think the farming community, certainly, was really—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
Beatrice Wishart has been flagging that point since last year. The answers are there; you have said that on the record. All those things have been discussed, agreed and put to bed, so, if there is no issue, why was that information not communicated before this point?
On the calving intervals SSI, the trust issue is that you gave guarantees that you would take into account the issues that island and crofting communities face, but, to date, you have not put on the record what the derogations and supports will be. You can understand why there is a lack of support when you say to people, “Yes, of course we are taking cognisance of this,” but you do not give the information. I feel as though we have dragged information out of you today about the fact that this can be delivered with no cost and will not be detrimental to people. Had that been made clear, I do not think that we would have had this communication. We are all trying to get to the same place, so why is there reluctance to give the guarantees that people need?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
It feels like you are putting the cart before the horse. We had understood that the rural support plan was going to be the foundation of everything—that it was the strategy for how agriculture was going to be supported. It now feels like it will be a jigsaw puzzle of some things that are already in place and some things that are not. It does not feel very straightforward. Will the rural support plan be a meaningful document, or will it be a load of other pre-decided policies put together? Will there be a rural support plan in the way that we understood?