The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 859 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
My sound is working.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
Would you consider rural proofing future policy in this area, which would involve looking through a rural lens at areas where it is really difficult to get access to legal representation?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Rhoda Grant
I asked about rural proofing policy.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Rhoda Grant
A lot of farmers and crofters tell us that, when they audit their carbon emissions, the mitigation that they take means that they are net zero, but that does not seem to add together. Has the Scottish Government done any more work on the mitigations that are already in place to take account of them when cutting farm and croft emissions?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Rhoda Grant
I wonder whether there will be unintended consequences. For example, agriculture is being asked to do things such as reduce animal numbers, but that is going to cut down food production. Although the whole of the company may be net zero, therefore, we will be losing out on food production and possibly end up importing food that is more carbon heavy than what we are producing at home.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Rhoda Grant
Yes. I guess I am a little concerned that, if native woodland does not store carbon so quickly, there will possibly be a push not to use it and to leave it in the ground, so that it slowly stores carbon, rather than taking it and using it for other purposes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Rhoda Grant
As a supplementary to that, Future Economy Scotland has suggested that private finance could increase project costs by almost 50 per cent. Does that provide good value for money?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Rhoda Grant
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Rhoda Grant
An awful lot of agricultural funding goes toward activities that might be reduced if land is devoted to peatland restoration and tree planting. Rather than using a tick-box exercise to encourage them, is there a way to mitigate any losses that might be caused?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Rhoda Grant
People who carry out their own carbon audits may be taking mitigation measures—not necessarily tree planting, cutting animal numbers or things like that, but generating electricity or doing other things on their land. However, the carbon audits do not seem to take that activity into account. Given that such activity helps to offset the carbon that they emit, will there be measures to take that into account so that the various organisations that are, in reality, net zero are recognised as such?